Staring at the Sun, 17 :: home :: |
Hand-me-down
parts.
|
A-P VISUAL: |
||
F6 w/Diagonal |
35mm Pan |
Focuses near outer limit w/o extension, 2-inch extension also works. |
16mm Nag |
works well w/2-inch extension. | |
12mm Nag |
works well w/2-inch extension. | |
+ Barlow |
Should work fine, not tried (clouds!) | |
F4.5 w/Diagonal |
35mm Pan |
focuses comfortably. |
16mm Nag |
focuses comfortably. | |
12mm Nag |
focuses comfortably. | |
F6 w/Binoviewer & diagonal |
Use Barlow behind the diagonal, then focuses nicely. Needs about another 3/4 - 1 inch of in-focus to work without the barlow. Not worth more tube shortening, but consider some shortened diagonal options? | |
F4.5 w/Binoviewer & diagonal |
no chance | |
Binoviewer straight-thru |
Not tried at any FL. | |
A-P DSLR: | (All tests using wide mouth adapter and T-ring; the mini-extension ring machined for previous focuser arrangement is removed.) | |
F6 w/Diagonal |
Focuses OK (1430 pixels = 1/2 deg) (F6) | |
F6 straight thru |
With 2-inch extension, focuses near outer limit | |
+ Barlow (@ F6) |
Barlow works behind the diagonal at F6 (~2300mm FL, 3.0x, F18) | |
F4.5 w/Diagonal |
Insufficient in-travel (not particularly close, an inch?) The light path through the diagonal constitutes an extension which is too long now. Think about a shortened diagonal (see binoviewing note above). |
|
F4.5 straight thru |
Focuses near outer limit. 1240 pxiels = 1/2° (0.87x) (F5/2). Note that A-P PF adapter will not insert in Blue Fireball extension, something's off by a few thousandths. Will likely over-extend the camera and make sufficient in-travel impossible. |
|
A-P CCD: | ||
F6 straight thru |
Not yet tried | |
F4.5 straight thru |
Not yet tried (presumably, the custom extension will be too long, so be prepared to shorten it or use Nikon extension tubes) | |
F6 + barlow |
Not yet tried | |
8/22/2010. Happy 90th birthday, Ray Bradbury. The
Lunt with the 0.8-inch FeatherTouch add-on used as its primary focuser requires
a short extension to reach focus comfortably -- it just focuses
with the B600 tube extended so far that it seems insecure. I'll
routinely use it visually with an extension in the eyepiece holder instead
(this extension is the shell of the shorty barlow whose lens I stole to screw
into the prime focus adapter). All my favorite solar eyepieces (20mm and 10.5mm
Plossls, 7mm Nagler) focus nicely there and are almost parfocal. The 50D still
will not reach focus without a barlow. But with single and double barlows,
it focuses very solidly. I could shorten the B600 tube a
little and the camera would surely focus without a barlow now, but why would
I want it to? I have a full-disk image with the single barlow. I could probably
use the T-threads on the eyepiece side of the B600 and also reach unbarlowed
focus.
I'm on the verge of making a big change to the way I acquire H-a images through this telescope, so I'll refrain from lots of detailed case studies (like those for the A-P above). More when I know more.
In the meantime, here are two images of a very quiet sun. Focus was painless with the Feathertouch -- no more rubber bands for assisted weight-lifting, so fumbling, no fuss. You just blow up a detail in LiveView and turn the FeathetTouch's fine-focus knob back and forth until you're satisifed. That's all.
Single barlow, 3 x 1.6s, ISO 400. THe usual Bayer
plane
extraction, manually aligned in Photoshop.
1 frame, carefully focused. 0.4s ISO 400.
Those are not bad images from what was supposed to be mostly a gear-testing session. I wanted baseline images for the 50D and shot a range of exposures from 0.02s to 1.6s, three each, at two different EFL's. All were ISO 400. And I wanted to see if the FeatherTouch made a significant difference in sharpness. Maybe. It was certainly much easier to achieve sharpness similar to what I have previously enjoyed. The difference owing to seeing was much starker than usual among the close-up frames, so either the bar has been raised or the air is very unsteady today. Either way, the ability to select the best frames from a long series becomes apparent.
8/23/2010: And happy 89th birthday to my dad. I did a tour of the Sun with the solar outfit on the G11 set up in the front lawn in Johnson City. Preston Wolfe, Eric Job, Bill Hyers and, later, Van McClellan, all got an eyeful of filaments and prominences. In the process, I discovered that the G11 has no decent balance point for the Lunt: one counterweight is too much, none is too little. The brass extension on the counterweight bar is not enough by itself, either. If putting the solar outfit on the G11 gets to be a habit, you'll need either more weight on the telescope side or less on the counterweight side. Don't react to this with a design and fabrication fit or a used gear search until and unless it becomes obvious that Sun will be a regular target for G11-mounted glass. The Giro might be better on the road and the Mach 1 gets the nod for use at home.
Oh, and another thing: store the stepper motor cables with the electronics and the 7AH traveling battery. Why would I keep them anywhere else? Maybe I had a reason but I can't imagine what it was. The 6-inch achromat should balance on the G11 easily (given that it is similar in weight and size to the 5-inch A-P), but in light of the experience with the Lunt, make sure before investing travel time and funds in it. Sheesh.
Over lunch the systems group kicked around the free C++ compilers available from Microsoft and the practicality of using an SDK supplied by Point Grey Research to support their high-resolution monochrome cameras. One reason the cameras are so affordable is the rudimentary software with which they ship. If the basic capture utility is sufficient, great; if the SDK can be used to make it sufficient, better. I get to learn C++ and do high rez imaging as my lab exercise. Via email, Al supplied his favorite references for C++, and then had Barnes & Noble send the top of the heap to me (thanks!). I added a more basic text by the same writer (Bjarne Stroudstrup, who should know all there is to know about the subject). So all that remains is the hardware, and I'll get that on the way soon.
:: top ::